Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Vanguard ETF Report Critical of Back-Tested Data Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Monday, July 23, 2012

Vanguard ETF Report Critical of Back-Tested Data

Reported by Chris Cumming

Vanguard has just released a research report that throws cold water on the "back-tested" performance data many new ETFs provide in lieu of actual performance information. The report finds that back-tested performance doesn't correlate with real performance -- but it does help new funds attract assets.

Back-tested data measures of a new fund's hypothetical performance against a specific index over a selected period. The problem, according to Vanguard's research, is that there has been such a boom in both ETF creation and index creation that now ETF sponsors can pick and choose a benchmark that makes their fund's hypothetical performance look more attractive.

As of last November 31, Vanguard reports, there were about 1,400 U.S.-listed ETFs tracking over 1,000 different indices. Additionally, the percentage of ETFs using alternative weighting methods in their benchmark jumped from 5 percent in 2000 to 50 percent in 2011.

So it's no surprise that this impressive hypothetical performance against a cherry-picked index with an adjusted weighting does not correspond to future returns. < br />
But Vanguard has found that back-tested data does have one use. According to the report, ETFs that provided back-filled data attracted, on average, over $70 million in their first six months, compared to around $40 million for those that didn't offer back-filled data.

The press release is below; the full report can be read here.

VANGUARD: INDEX DEVELOPMENT RISES WITH ETF PRODUCT GROWTH


               VALLEY FORGE, PA, (JULY 23, 2012)—The rapid growth in exchange-traded fund (ETF) development has coincided with the proliferation of target benchmarks according to Joined at the hip: ETF and index development. As of March 31, 2012, more than $1.2 trillion was invested in about 1,400 U.S.-listed ETFs (source: Strategic Insight’s Simfund) and currently, U.S.-listed ETFs seek to track more than 1,000 different indexes (source: Vanguard, based on Bloomberg data). Vanguard researchers find that more than half of these discrete indexes had been in existence for less than six months before the launch of an ETF that seeks to track it. In addition, more than half of the indexes use back-tested performance data (i.e., data based on retroactively applying the index methodology to historical data) in lieu of or in addition to live performance data (i.e., real-time performance data after index-live date).

            The new paper demonstrates that back-tested performance data may not be a reliable indicator of how an index will perform after it is launched. Using data for 370 indexes that had at least six months of back-filled data and six months of live data in the period from 2000 through 2011, Vanguard researchers analyzed the performance of these indexes both in the back-filled data period and in live data. They found that while 87% of the indexes outperformed the broad U.S. stock market for the time in which back-tested data were used, only 51% did so after the index was launched.

            “When historical index performance is hypothetical, the notion that past performance may not indicate future results is especially true,” said Joel Dickson, one of the study’s authors and a principal in Vanguard’s Investment Strategy Group.   

            While securities regulations prohibit the use of back-tested performance for most U.S. mutual fund and ETF providers, index providers are not held to the same rules. Index providers, therefore, have used back-filled data and offered it through public means, either on their own websites or via third-party data providers, which often makes it difficult for investors to discern which data are hypothetical and which are live.

            Many investors view an index as an objective market-capitalized representation of a market or market segment, but alternative index-weighting methodologies have exploded in the last decade. Vanguard researchers found that 20 different weighting methods and 27 different selection criteria exist for indexes that seek to be tracked by ETFs. According to IndexUniverse, the percentage of ETF products based on alternative weighting approaches jumped from 5% in 2000 to almost 50% in 2011.

            The analysis shows that recent index creation may not only be about providing investible benchmarks for market segments; it may be about providing ETF sponsors a way to market and promote new products with ready-made indexes that might jump-start the acceptance and viability of new offerings.

            Vanguard is the third largest U.S. ETF provider by assets under management and leads the industry in year-to-date cash flow of $28.8 billion into U.S.-based ETFs through the first half of the year. The firm manages 64 ETFs with a total of $209 billion in ETF assets. Vanguard is increasing its ETF-focused research, including two recent research papers, Evaluating dollar-weighted returns of ETFs versus traditional fund returns, which examines the forces influencing return differences, including timing of the fund’s returns and cash flow relative to assets, and ETFs: For the better or bettor, which demonstrates that most Vanguard investors exhibit buy-and-hold behavior whether they are investing in a traditional index fund or in an ETF.       

About Vanguard

Vanguard, headquartered in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, is one of the world’s largest investment management companies and a leading provider of company-sponsored retirement plan services. Vanguard manages more than $1.8 trillion in U.S. mutual fund assets. The firm offers more than 170 funds to U.S. investors and more than 70 additional funds in non-U.S. markets.
 

Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use