Quantcast
The MFWire
Manage Email Alerts | Sponsorships | About MFWire | Who We Are

Subscribe to MFWire.com's News Alerts [click]

Rating:Fido May Avoid the 'Systemically Significant' Label Not Rated 0.0 Email Routing List Email & Route  Print Print
Thursday, July 15, 2010

Fido May Avoid the 'Systemically Significant' Label

News summary by MFWire's editors

Fidelity and State Street both may soon have an extra reason to thank their newest U.S. Senator. CNBC's Eamon Javers reports that, thanks at least in part to Senator Scott Brown (R-Massachusetts), Fido has a better shot of not being labeled a "systemically significant" firm by the government and State Street may be able to partly get around the proposed Volcker rule against proprietary trading.

CNBC notes that Representative Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee and a key player in the financial reform bill negotiations, probably also had a hand in helping on one or both of those provisions (since he, too, hails from the Bay State).

Mammoth Fidelity worried that -- under one definition that focuses on size -- it might be considered systemically significant and thus face extra regulation and more. Thanks at least in part to Brown, that definition now instead focuses on what the firm does (notably how interconnected and leveraged it is) instead of size. Ned Johnson and his team at the mutual fund titan seem satisified.

"During the debate over past several months we expressed concern that some financial regulatory reform proposals would have unintended consequences and restrict well run entities in Massachusetts and elsewhere, and treat Fidelity as a bank -- which would be inappropriate for our business and risk model," a Fido statement to CNBC reads. "We believe it is important to avoid a 'one size fits all' approach for different segments of the financial sector."

State Street, CNBC adds, worried instead about a complete Volcker-esque ban on proprietary trading by banks. Brown helped change that ban to a restriction whereby banks could provide three percent or less of a hedge fund's or private equity fund's capital and could invest three percent of less of their "Tier one" capital.

The New York Times' "DealBook" blog followed up on the news. And here's a video clip from CNBC. 

Edited by: Neil Anderson, Managing Editor


Stay ahead of the news ... Sign up for our email alerts now
CLICK HERE

0.0
 Do You Recommend This Story?



GO TO: MFWire
Return to Top
 News Archives
2024: Q2Q1
2023: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2022: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2021: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2020: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2019: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2018: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2017: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2016: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2015: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2014: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2013: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2012: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2011: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2010: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2009: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2008: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2007: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2006: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2005: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2004: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2003: Q4Q3Q2Q1
2002: Q4Q3Q2Q1
 Subscribe via RSS:
Raw XML
Add to My Yahoo!
follow us in feedly




©All rights reserved to InvestmentWires, Inc. 1997-2024
14 Wall Street | 20th Floor | New York, NY 10005 | P: 212-331-8968 | F: 212-331-8998
Privacy Policy :: Terms of Use